COMPARING FIRST AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: A COGNITIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL PERSPECTIVE

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15667333

Authors

  • G’ofurova Laziza Jasur qizi lazizagofurova52@gmail.com Faculty of Cybersecurity, Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad Al-Khwarizmi Author
  • Glarelin John glarelinjohn2000@gmail.com General Medicine, Tashkent State Dental Institute Author
  • Yesbosinova Nursulu Senior instructor of Uzbek and Foreign languages Department of the TITLI Author

Keywords:

First Language Acquisition (FLA), Second Language Acquisition (SLA), cognitive development, language learning, critical period hypothesis, language input, interaction, phonological development, language transfer

Abstract

This paper explores the distinctions and similarities between First Language

Acquisition (FLA) and Second Language Acquisition (SLA). It outlines their unique

characteristics in terms of age of acquisition, cognitive processes, input and interaction,

and ultimate language proficiency. Drawing on academic literature and practical

examples, the study illustrates how both biological and environmental factors contribute

to language learning. The article highlights the advantages of early language exposure,

the challenges adults face in learning new languages, and the potential of modern

technology to bridge this gap. The aim is to provide learners and educators with a deeper

understanding of language acquisition mechanisms to foster more effective learning

strategies.

References

. Azieb, S. (2021). The Critical Period Hypothesis in Second Language Acquisition: A

review of the literature. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social

Studies, 8(4), 20–26. 2. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second Language Learning Theories. London, UK:

Arnold Publishers/Oxford University Press. 3. Hickey, R. (n.d.). First and Second Language Acquisition: A Brief Comparison. Retrieved from [insert URL or source if applicable]. 4. N.P.Yesbosinova, Dospanova D.O. Scientific Research in the Field Of Pedagogy and

Their. https://www.eudoxuspress.com/index.php/pub 2024y. 5. Yesbosinova N.P. The Lingua Spectrum 3

rd November, 2024. Using CLIL

Technology in teaching English to non-philological students: methodological

approaches. https://lingvospektr.uz/index.php/lngsp/article/view/162

N.P.Yesbosinova, Improving lingo-cultural competence in teaching medical

terminology at higher medical education institutions. Muttafakir №29, October 2024.

. Abdullaeva S. Kh. Didactic Principles and Tasks in Organizing Independent Work in

the Language of the Specialty. 10-14 page. 04. 04.2022y

Abdullaeva S. Kh., Gayubova K. A., Yulanova N.D. Dependence of Russian

Language Science on Innovative Technologies. https://jchr.org/index.php/JCHR/article/view/1561

Abdullaeva S. Kh., Dospanova D.U. The Pedagogical Science and Innovation

Technologies in Different Country. https://museonaturalistico.it/index.php/journal/article/view/591

Downloads

Published

2025-06-19