LEARNER PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS AI IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, English Language Learning, Learner Perceptions, Learner Attitudes, Technology Integration, Personalized Learning, Human-Computer Interaction, Affective Factors.Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into English Language Learning (ELL) is rapidly transforming educational landscapes. This study explores learner perceptions and attitudes towards AI-powered tools within ELL, examining factors influencing their acceptance, engagement, and perceived effectiveness. Through a mixed-methods approach, including surveys and semi-structured interviews, the research investigates learners' views on AI's role in personalized learning, feedback provision, and overall learning experience. The findings reveal a complex interplay of positive perceptions regarding AI's potential for individualized support and negative concerns about the lack of human interaction and potential biases. This paper discusses the implications of these findings for the design and implementation of AI-driven ELL tools, emphasizing the importance of addressing learner concerns and fostering a human-centered approach to technology integration.
References
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived control, computer anxiety, and playfulness with the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2006). The legacy of the technology acceptance model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(4), 244-254.
Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2005). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 283-295.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Mathieson, C. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. ACM SIGMIS Database, 32(1), 86-103.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived control, computer anxiety, and playfulness with the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). The technology acceptance model: Still relevant in the digital age. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 1-12.
Kumar, R. R., Saxena, A., Thotla, D., Fallah, M. H., Teshayeva, D., Shodiyev, S., & Singh, S. (2024). Investigation on refrigeration cycle using refrigerants 404a & 410a. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 563, p. 01005). EDP Sciences.
E’Zoza, X., & Dildora, T. (2024). ENHANCING CALL (COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING) FOR EAP (ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES) AND ESP (ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES) STUDENTS. Science and innovation, 3(Special Issue 32), 773-775.
Teshaeva, D. (2024). THE HISTORY AND CURRENT STATUS OF COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS. SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO THE MODERN EDUCATION SYSTEM, 3(25), 189-191.
Kozimovna, T. Z. (2023). TILSHUNOSLIKDA DISKURS TUSHUNCHASI MOHIYATINING YORITILSHI. Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (CARJIS), (4 (16)), 34-39.
Published
Versions
- 2025-03-14 (2)
- 2025-03-07 (1)
