TEACHING ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING AT SCHOOL: ACHIEVEMENTS, PREFERENCES, AND PROFITS

Authors

  • Dildora Isroilova,Alisherova Mohinur Muhiddin kizi Namangan state university phd researcher Scientific Supervisor Docor of Pedagogical Sciences, Prof Author

Keywords:

argumentative writing; secondary literacy; strategy instruction; writing-to-learn; Toulmin model; meta-analysis; classroom practice.

Abstract

Argumentative writing is a cornerstone of academic literacy, critical thinking, and civic

participation. This article synthesizes high-quality research on how schools can teach argumentation

effectively and what achievements (“learning outcomes”), preferences (learner and teacher

dispositions and contextual affordances), and profits (educational and societal benefits) are associated

with this instruction. Using a focused narrative review of meta-analyses, practice guides, and

influential programmatic studies, we map evidence-based instructional principles—including explicit

strategy instruction, genre modeling, goal setting, collaborative practice, cycles of planning–drafting–

revising, and writing-to-learn tasks across the curriculum.

References

Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2013). Writing instruction that works: Proven methods for

middle and high school classrooms. Teachers College Press. (PhilPapers)

Ferretti, R. P., & De La Paz, S. (2019). Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and

instruction. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1345–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09950-x

(SpringerLink)

Graham, S., & Hebert, M. A. (2010). Writing to Read: Evidence for how writing can improve

reading. Carnegie Corporation of New York. (Carnegie Media, carnegie.org)

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective strategies to improve writing of

adolescents in middle and high schools. Alliance for Excellent Education. (Carnegie Media)

Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. National

Conference on Research in English. (See also Hillocks, 1984 meta-analysis). (ERIC, Chicago

Journals)

Landrieu, Y., et al. (2023). Argumentation in collaboration: The impact of explicit instruction on

argumentative writing performance and self-efficacy. Humanities & Social Sciences

Communications, 10, Article 222. (PMC)

Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning

argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273–304. (JSTOR)

Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the

generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 157–

(ERIC).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-16